On 10/20/2023 4:59 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 20/10/2023 10:13, Tao Zhang wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
index b25284e..97654aa 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
if (drvdata && tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata))
of_property_read_u32(drvdata->dev->of_node,
- "qcom,dsb_msr_num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
+ "qcom,dsb-msrs-num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
So you never tested your DTS... We can keep asking about this but still
testing does not happen :/
Since this new property has not been applied on the exist upstream DTS,
I tested this driver with the
local DTS. Unfortunately, the property name in the local DTS is not
updated, this is why it is not found
But your local DTS would not pass dtbs_check tests, so that's why I am
saying - you never tested it on mainline kernel.
Thanks, we will add this test in the future to ensure that DTS, doc and
driver are consistent.
Best,
Tao
Best regards,
Krzysztof
