On 10/20/2023 2:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 20/10/2023 04:51, Tao Zhang wrote:
Correct the property name of the DSB MSR number that needs to be
read in TPDM driver. The right property name is
"qcom,dsb-msrs-num".
Missing Fixes tag.
I will add it in the next patch.
This patch depends on patch series "Add support to configure TPDM DSB
subunit"
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=788353
This is not suitable for commit msg. Dependencies are noted under ---.
And how is this depending on that patch? Your buggy code was applied
long time ago!
Yes, no need to depend on the patch series and it has been applied. I
will remove this comments
in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
index b25284e..97654aa 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
if (drvdata && tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata))
of_property_read_u32(drvdata->dev->of_node,
- "qcom,dsb_msr_num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
+ "qcom,dsb-msrs-num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
So you never tested your DTS... We can keep asking about this but still
testing does not happen :/
Since this new property has not been applied on the exist upstream DTS,
I tested this driver with the
local DTS. Unfortunately, the property name in the local DTS is not
updated, this is why it is not found
in the tests.
Best,
Tao
Best regards,
Krzysztof
