On 10/15/2015 02:05 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 10/14, Archit Taneja wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_28nm_8960.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_28nm_8960.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e71b4ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_28nm_8960.c
@@ -0,0 +1,529 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2012-2015, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
+ * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
Is this include used?
It isn't. I'll remove it.
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+
+#include "dsi_pll.h"
+#include "dsi.xml.h"
+
+/*
[..]
+
+#define to_pll_28nm(x) container_of(x, struct dsi_pll_28nm, base)
+
+static bool pll_28nm_poll_for_ready(struct dsi_pll_28nm *pll_28nm,
+ u32 nb_tries, u32 timeout_us)
Why not use unsigned types for these counts? I don't imagine we
care about being precisely 32 bits.
Yeah. We don't even need an unsigned type. I'll replace it with integer
type.
+{
+ bool pll_locked = false;
+ u32 val;
+
[..]
+ DBG("id=%d", pll_28nm->id);
+
+ /*
+ * before enabling the PLL, configure the bit clock divider since we
+ * don't expose it as a clock to the outside world
+ * 1: read back the byte clock divider that should aready be set
s/aready/already/
Thanks, I'll fix this.
+ * 2: divide by 8 to get bit clock divider
+ * 3: write it to POSTDIV1
+ */
+ val = pll_read(base + REG_DSI_28nm_8960_PHY_PLL_CTRL_9);
+ byte_div = val + 1;
+ bit_div = byte_div / 8;
+
+ val = pll_read(base + REG_DSI_28nm_8960_PHY_PLL_CTRL_8);
[..]
+
+static void dsi_pll_28nm_destroy(struct msm_dsi_pll *pll)
+{
+ struct dsi_pll_28nm *pll_28nm = to_pll_28nm(pll);
+ int i;
+
+ msm_dsi_pll_helper_unregister_clks(pll_28nm->pdev,
+ pll_28nm->clks, pll_28nm->num_clks);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_PROVIDED_CLKS; i++)
+ pll_28nm->provided_clks[i] = NULL;
+
+ pll_28nm->num_clks = 0;
+ pll_28nm->clk_data.clks = NULL;
+ pll_28nm->clk_data.clk_num = 0;
Is all this really necessary?
It isn't. I copy pasted from dsi_pll_28nm.c and it had this. Will make
a patch to remove it from that file too.
+}
+
+static int pll_28nm_register(struct dsi_pll_28nm *pll_28nm)
+{
+ char clk_name[32], parent[32], vco_name[32];
+ struct clk_init_data vco_init = {
+ .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "pxo" },
+ .num_parents = 1,
+ .name = vco_name,
+ .ops = &clk_ops_dsi_pll_28nm_vco,
+ };
+ struct device *dev = &pll_28nm->pdev->dev;
+ struct clk **clks = pll_28nm->clks;
+ struct clk **provided_clks = pll_28nm->provided_clks;
+ struct clk_bytediv *bytediv;
+ struct clk_init_data bytediv_init;
struct clk_init_data bytediv_init = { };
Just in case we add some new field there?
Will do.
+ int ret, num = 0;
+
+ DBG("%d", pll_28nm->id);
+
+ bytediv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bytediv), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!bytediv)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ pll_28nm->bytediv = bytediv;
+
+ snprintf(vco_name, 32, "dsi%dvco_clk", pll_28nm->id);
+ pll_28nm->base.clk_hw.init = &vco_init;
+
+ clks[num++] = clk_register(dev, &pll_28nm->base.clk_hw);
+
+ /* prepare and register bytediv */
+ bytediv->hw.init = &bytediv_init;
+ bytediv->reg = pll_28nm->mmio + REG_DSI_28nm_8960_PHY_PLL_CTRL_9;
+
+ snprintf(parent, 32, "dsi%dvco_clk", pll_28nm->id);
+ snprintf(clk_name, 32, "dsi%dpllbyte", pll_28nm->id);
+
+ bytediv_init.name = clk_name;
+ bytediv_init.ops = &clk_bytediv_ops;
+ bytediv_init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
+ bytediv_init.parent_names = (const char *[]) { parent };
Can't we just do &parent instead of this anonymous array?
&parent doesn't make sense here. parent in this function is an array
of characters, not a pointer to a character.
I can think of only this way. We do something similar when we call
clk_register_mux() in dsi_pll_28nm.c.
Archit
+ bytediv_init.num_parents = 1;
+
+ /* DIV2 */
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
