On 15/09/2023 10:52, Tengfei Fan wrote: > > > 在 9/15/2023 3:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道: >> On 15/09/2023 04:15, Tengfei Fan wrote: >>> Add the SoC specific compatible for SM4450 implementing arm,mmu-500. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 3 +++ >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml >>> index cf29ab10501c..b57751c8ad90 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml >>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ properties: >>> - qcom,sdx55-smmu-500 >>> - qcom,sdx65-smmu-500 >>> - qcom,sdx75-smmu-500 >>> + - qcom,sm4450-smmu-500 >>> - qcom,sm6115-smmu-500 >>> - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500 >>> - qcom,sm6350-smmu-500 >>> @@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ properties: >>> - qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500 >>> - qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500 >>> - qcom,sdm845-smmu-500 >>> + - qcom,sm4450-smmu-500 >> >> Isn't there comment just few lines above your edit? Comment saying DON'T? >> >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >> > Hi Kraysztof > I seems haven't understand your comments totaly. > I want to confirm that if you think only need "qcom,smmu-500" and > "arm,mmu-500" compitbale name, needn't specific compitable name for each > platform? No, please read the comment. It tells you explicitly what to do - which compatible add where. Best regards, Krzysztof
