Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add compatible for SM4450 SoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





在 9/15/2023 3:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
On 15/09/2023 04:15, Tengfei Fan wrote:
Add the SoC specific compatible for SM4450 implementing arm,mmu-500.

Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
index cf29ab10501c..b57751c8ad90 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ properties:
                - qcom,sdx55-smmu-500
                - qcom,sdx65-smmu-500
                - qcom,sdx75-smmu-500
+              - qcom,sm4450-smmu-500
                - qcom,sm6115-smmu-500
                - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500
                - qcom,sm6350-smmu-500
@@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ properties:
                - qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500
                - qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500
                - qcom,sdm845-smmu-500
+              - qcom,sm4450-smmu-500

Isn't there comment just few lines above your edit? Comment saying DON'T?


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Hi Kraysztof
I seems haven't understand your comments totaly.
I want to confirm that if you think only need "qcom,smmu-500" and "arm,mmu-500" compitbale name, needn't specific compitable name for each platform?

--
Thx and BRs,
Tengfei Fan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux