On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 09:43:37PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Hey Sudeep,
>
> On 8/14/23 14:55, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 02:18:18AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > > The perf power scale value would currently be reported as bogowatts if the
> > > platform firmware supports microwatt power scale and meets the perf major
> > > version requirements. Fix this by populating version information in the
> > > driver private data before the call to protocol attributes is made.
> > >
> > > CC: Chandra Sekhar Lingutla <quic_lingutla@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Fixes: 3630cd8130ce ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.1 perf power-cost in microwatts")
> > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> > > index c0cd556fbaae..30dedd6ebfde 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> > > @@ -1080,6 +1080,8 @@ static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
> >
> > Please rebase any patch when posting upstream on upstream kernel tree.
> > This definitely looks like some downstream tree. I will adjust and apply
> > this time. This file never crossed 1000 line and this patch indicates
> > otherwise, so I am sure Qcom has some downstream changes in this file now.
>
> Thanks for taking time to review the patch but zero points for the ^^
> deduction lol. The correct phrasing would be v6.5 rc6 hasn't crossed 1k
> lines but the patch was based on next-20230809 which has the perf level
> indexing mode support in addition :)
You are right. Cristian reminded me about v3.2 perf changes in -next after
I replied on this thread. I saw this as fix and was looking at only upstream
tree and this didn't apply cleanly.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
