On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 10:13:30AM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote: > Hi, Andi > > 在 2023/8/5 6:16, Andi Shyti 写道: > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 05:57:36PM +0800, Liao Chang wrote: > >> Use the dev_err_probe function instead of dev_err in the probe function > >> so that the printed messge includes the return value and also handles > >> -EPROBE_DEFER nicely. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 12 ++++-------- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c > >> index c3287c887c6f..bfa788b3775b 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c > >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c > >> @@ -569,10 +569,8 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> sizeof(lpi2c_imx->adapter.name)); > >> > >> ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(&pdev->dev, &lpi2c_imx->clks); > >> - if (ret < 0) { > >> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get I2C peripheral clock, ret=%d\n", ret); > >> - return ret; > >> - } > >> + if (ret < 0) > >> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "can't get I2C peripheral clock\n"); > > > > you cut on this because the line was going over 100 characters? :) > > > > In theory you shouldn't change the print message when doing such > > changes and you can still split it as: > > > > return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, > > "can't get I2C peripheral clock, ret=%d\n", > > ret); > > > > and you're even within the 80 characters. > > Since dev_err_probe always print the second parameter that happens to be the return value, > I remove the "ret=%d" from the original message to avoid a redundant error message. > > So is it better to keep the original message unchanged, even though dev_err_probe also prints > the return error value? Or is it better to make this change so that all error messages printed > in the probe function include the return value in a consistent style? yes, you are right! Then please ignore this comment, but... > > ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, lpi2c_imx_isr, 0, > > pdev->name, lpi2c_imx); > > - if (ret) { > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't claim irq %d\n", irq); > > - return ret; > > - } > > + if (ret) > > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "can't claim irq %d\n", irq); please make it coherent to this second part, as well, where the error number is printed. Thank you, Andi