On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 at 00:23, Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Since the revision becomes an opaque identifier with future GPUs, move > away from treating different ranges of bits as having a given meaning. > This means that we need to explicitly list different patch revisions in > the device table. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a4xx_gpu.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 14 ++- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 137 +++++++++++---------- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 14 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h | 49 ++++---- > 7 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> -- With best wishes Dmitry
