在 2023/7/31 15:34, Uwe Kleine-König 写道:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 10:16:38AM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
>> 在 2023/7/28 13:55, Uwe Kleine-König 写道:
>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:31:47AM +0800, Liao Chang wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
>>>> index c3287c887c6f..9021b8064ae4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
>>>> @@ -569,10 +569,8 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> sizeof(lpi2c_imx->adapter.name));
>>>>
>>>> ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(&pdev->dev, &lpi2c_imx->clks);
>>>> - if (ret < 0) {
>>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get I2C peripheral clock, ret=%d\n", ret);
>>>> - return ret;
>>>> - }
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "can't get I2C peripheral clock\n");
>>>
>>> The change looks good, however I wonder why you didn't convert the other
>>> dev_err() called by lpi2c_imx_probe() in the same way.
>>
>> Sorry, I am in hurry and don't clean it up as much as.
>>
>> Actually, I am not sure if I should convert all dev_err calls to dev_err_probe, or just
>> replace the ones that print the 'return value'. I know that dev_err_probe is better
>> suited for printing return values, but I am nore sure if it's worth the effort to convert
>> all of the calls, for example, the second dev_err in lpi2c_imx_probe():
>>
>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, lpi2c_imx_isr, 0, pdev->name, lpi2c_imx);
>> if (ret)
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't claim rqi %d\n", irq);
>> return ret;
>> }
>
> I'd say yes. The return value of devm_request_irq() might be interesting
> in the error message. Also emitting error messages in a consistent style
> is nice.
Sounds good, I will convert them all in the next revision.
Thanks.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
--
BR
Liao, Chang
