Hello,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 10:16:38AM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
> 在 2023/7/28 13:55, Uwe Kleine-König 写道:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:31:47AM +0800, Liao Chang wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> >> index c3287c887c6f..9021b8064ae4 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> >> @@ -569,10 +569,8 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> sizeof(lpi2c_imx->adapter.name));
> >>
> >> ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(&pdev->dev, &lpi2c_imx->clks);
> >> - if (ret < 0) {
> >> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get I2C peripheral clock, ret=%d\n", ret);
> >> - return ret;
> >> - }
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "can't get I2C peripheral clock\n");
> >
> > The change looks good, however I wonder why you didn't convert the other
> > dev_err() called by lpi2c_imx_probe() in the same way.
>
> Sorry, I am in hurry and don't clean it up as much as.
>
> Actually, I am not sure if I should convert all dev_err calls to dev_err_probe, or just
> replace the ones that print the 'return value'. I know that dev_err_probe is better
> suited for printing return values, but I am nore sure if it's worth the effort to convert
> all of the calls, for example, the second dev_err in lpi2c_imx_probe():
>
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, lpi2c_imx_isr, 0, pdev->name, lpi2c_imx);
> if (ret)
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't claim rqi %d\n", irq);
> return ret;
> }
I'd say yes. The return value of devm_request_irq() might be interesting
in the error message. Also emitting error messages in a consistent style
is nice.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
