Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: input: qcom,pm8xxx-vib: add more PMIC support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/07/2023 04:37, Fenglin Wu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/18/2023 3:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/07/2023 08:25, Fenglin Wu wrote:
>>> Add support for vibrator module inside Qualcomm PMI632, PM7250B, PM7325B
>>> and PM7550BA PMICs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml | 4 ++++
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml
>>> index c8832cd0d7da..642408e2b35f 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ properties:
>>>         - qcom,pm8058-vib
>>>         - qcom,pm8916-vib
>>>         - qcom,pm8921-vib
>>> +      - qcom,pmi632-vib
>>> +      - qcom,pm7250b-vib
>>> +      - qcom,pm7325b-vib
>>> +      - qcom,pm7550ba-vib
>>
>> Aren't the last two compatible?
> 
> There are still every different PMICs even though the vibrator module in 
> PM7325B and PM7550BA are the same and they share the same register base 
> address as well.

So the vibrator modules are compatible? Then I propose to make them
compatible.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux