On 2023-06-16 12:49:29, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 16/06/2023 01:26, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > On 2023-06-13 03:09:42, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >> sm6115 and qcm2290 do not have INTF_0. Drop corresponding interface > >> definitions. > > > > As Abhinav said, add sm6375. > > > > If it wasn't for sc8280xp using INTF_NONE for fake MST, we could have > > dropped INTF_NONE and the special-cases in dpu_hw_interrupts.c and > > dpu_hw_intf.c entirely! Is that your plan? > > I have not thought about it yet. Generally I think INTF_NONE might still > be useful to document interfaces that we do not want to support for some > reason (e.g. MST or 8974/8084 eDP interfaces). Sounds good, then we only use it for existing but specialcase interfaces rather than for bogus/empty entries in the catalog! - Marijn > > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry >
