On 06/06/2023 11:06, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 08:37:04AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/06/2023 09:08, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
>>> Use the new top-level rpm-proc node instead of having a dummy top-level
>>> /smd node that only contains the RPM but not other remote processors.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
>>> index c6930706bfa9..06e574239bd4 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
>>> @@ -120,10 +120,10 @@ examples:
>>> [...]
>>> + compatible = "qcom,msm8916-rpm-proc", "qcom,rpm-proc";
>>>
>>> - rpm {
>>> + smd-edge {
>>
>> What about binding updates?
>>
>
> The binding for this is in PATCH 05/14. The old binding replaced here is
> deprecated in PATCH 07/14.
So changing example without changing binding is not an atomic change.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
