On 05/06/2023 09:08, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> Use the new top-level rpm-proc node instead of having a dummy top-level
> /smd node that only contains the RPM but not other remote processors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
> index c6930706bfa9..06e574239bd4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
> @@ -120,10 +120,10 @@ examples:
> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>
> - smd {
> - compatible = "qcom,smd";
> + remoteproc-rpm {
remoteproc
> + compatible = "qcom,msm8916-rpm-proc", "qcom,rpm-proc";
>
> - rpm {
> + smd-edge {
What about binding updates?
Anyway, this should be squashed with previous one.
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 168 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> qcom,ipc = <&apcs 8 0>;
> qcom,smd-edge = <15>;
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
