Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 05:44:02PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 03:49:04PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 01:06:49PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 18/05/2023 11:05, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:09:12AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > >> On 18/05/2023 07:40, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > > >>> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 09:00:49AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > >>>> On 17/05/2023 07:57, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> 
> > > It's not true. The error you see is result because you removed something
> > > you should not. I did not ask you to remove anything. So repeating -
> > > "add new item". Adding is not "removal and adding". Adding is just "adding".
> > 
> > See below for the changes that were tried and the corresponding errors.
> > 
> > (1) No lines removed
> > 
> > 	@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
> > 	       - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> > 		 enum:
> > 		   - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > 	+          - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
> > 
> > 	   reg:
> > 	     items:
> > 
> > 	dt_binding_check: No errors
> > 
> > 	dtbs_check	:
> > 		arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> > 	        ['qcom,ipq9574-tsens', 'qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too long
> 
> Which I figure you understand makes sense.
> 
> > (2) No lines removed
> > 
> > 	@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
> > 	       - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> > 		 enum:
> > 		   - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > 	+          - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
> > 	+        - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > 
> > 	   reg:
> > 	     items:
> > 
> > 	dt_binding_check: No errors
> > 
> > 	dtbs_check	: Gives errors for all the DTS files that have tsens-v0_1, tsens-v2, tsens-v1. Copy pasted a sample for each one of them
> > 		arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-huawei-g7.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8916-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v0_1']
> > 		arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953-xiaomi-tissot.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8953-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2']
> > 		arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8956-sony-xperia-loire-suzu.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8956-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v1']
> 
> I think you've missed an earlier error that points out the entire
> binding is invalid.
> 
> > (3) No lines removed
> > 	@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > 	 properties:
> > 	   compatible:
> > 	     oneOf:
> > 	+      - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > 	       - description: msm8960 TSENS based
> > 		 items:
> > 		   - enum:
> > 	@@ -66,6 +67,8 @@
> > 	       - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> > 		 enum:
> > 		   - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > 	+          - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
> > 	+        - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > 
> > 	   reg:
> > 	     items:
> > 
> > 	dt_binding_check: Same as above
> > 
> > 	dtbs_check	: Same as above
> 
> Ditto here.
> 
> > (4) Change 8074 from enum to const
> > 	@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > 	 properties:
> > 	   compatible:
> > 	     oneOf:
> > 	+      - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > 	       - description: msm8960 TSENS based
> > 		 items:
> > 		   - enum:
> > 	@@ -64,8 +65,10 @@
> > 		   - const: qcom,tsens-v2
> > 
> > 	       - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> > 	-        enum:
> > 	-          - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > 	+        items:
> > 	+          - enum:
> > 	+              - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
> > 	+          - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > 
> > 	   reg:
> > 	     items:
> > 
> > 	dt_binding_check: No errors
> > 
> > 	dtbs_check	: No errors
> > 
> > But (4) doesn't seem acceptable. Any other alternative to resolve this?
> 
> It now has a "random" entry up at the top w/ no description, not
> matching the existing style. Can you just fix that up & send a v(N+1)
> so that the discussion can restart in a less confusing way? I am trying
> to fill in for Krzysztof but I am struggling to follow the thread.

Sure. Will post the next version.

Thanks
Varada



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux