On 17/05/2023 07:57, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > Part-1 is adding the 'const' entries at the beginning i.e. > > + - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 > + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 > + - const: qcom,tsens-v2 > + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens > > Part-2 is changing from one valid syntax to another i.e. > > + items: > + - enum: > + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens > + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens > > Without both of the above changes, either or both of dtbs_check > & dt_binding_check fails. So, it is not possible to just add the > "valid hunk" (part-2) alone. Of course it is. All schema files work like that... > > If having both part-1 and part-2 in the same patch is not > acceptable, shall I split them into two patches? Please let me know. No, hunk one is not justified. Best regards, Krzysztof
