On 23/05/2023 09:20, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 04:58, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/18/2023 7:38 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Rework dpu_encoder initialization code, simplifying calling sequences
and separating common init parts.
Changes since v1:
- Withdrawn two pathes for a later consideration
- Changed dpu_encoder_phys_init() to return void (Abhinav)
- Added small simplifications of dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_init() and
dpu_encoder_phys_wb_init()
I had previously given these comments on the cover letter of v1, so
giving it again.
Please mention that your series was made on top of
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/116530/.
Figured it out when I tried to apply it to my branch to test.
I had tested v1, and between v1 and v2 i only see very trivial change,
so i think its okay to retain:
Tested-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> # sc7280
Unfortunately patchwork ignores tags sent in the cover letter thread.
But b4 does with -t option to b4 shazam or b4 am
Neil
Dmitry Baryshkov (7):
drm/msm/dpu: merge dpu_encoder_init() and dpu_encoder_setup()
drm/msm/dpu: separate common function to init physical encoder
drm/msm/dpu: drop duplicated intf/wb indices from encoder structs
drm/msm/dpu: inline dpu_encoder_get_wb()
drm/msm/dpu: call dpu_rm_get_intf() from dpu_encoder_get_intf()
drm/msm/dpu: drop temp variable from dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_init()
drm/msm/dpu: simplify dpu_encoder_phys_wb_init()
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 178 ++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.h | 14 +-
.../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h | 15 +-
.../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c | 35 ++--
.../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c | 19 +-
.../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_wb.c | 35 +---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 87 ++++-----
7 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 243 deletions(-)
