Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: input: touchscreen: add bindings for focaltech,fts5452

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski,

Konrad Dybcio suggested to use interrupts-extended instead interrupts.
So in my WIP v3, I have updated it in the dts and bindings example.
However, I am confused if I should replace the "interrupts" with
"interrupts-extended" property in the schema too? I see a lot of schemas
specifying "interrupts", with examples using "interrupts" or
"interrupts-extended". At the same time, I see some specifying both
"interrupts" and "interrupts-extended" (like one of these two) and very
few others specify only "interrupts-extended" in the schema. Which is
the currently recommended way to do this?

In between, the interrupt property should be a required property as the
driver will not function without an interrupt. I will fix that in v3.

Thanks,
Joel Selvaraj



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux