Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski, Konrad Dybcio suggested to use interrupts-extended instead interrupts. So in my WIP v3, I have updated it in the dts and bindings example. However, I am confused if I should replace the "interrupts" with "interrupts-extended" property in the schema too? I see a lot of schemas specifying "interrupts", with examples using "interrupts" or "interrupts-extended". At the same time, I see some specifying both "interrupts" and "interrupts-extended" (like one of these two) and very few others specify only "interrupts-extended" in the schema. Which is the currently recommended way to do this? In between, the interrupt property should be a required property as the driver will not function without an interrupt. I will fix that in v3. Thanks, Joel Selvaraj
