Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > [!] Note: This is a work in progress. At the moment, some things won't > > build if this patch is applied. nvme, kcm, smc, tls. Actually, that needs updating. nvme and smc now build. > Weelll ... what happens to consumers of kernel_sendpage()? > (Let's call them nvme ...) > Should they be moved over, too? Patch 42 should address NVMe, I think. I can't test it, though, as I don't have hardware. There should be no callers of kernel_sendmsg() by the end of this patchset, and the only remaining implementors of sendpage are Chelsio-TLS, AF_TLS and AF_KCM, which as stated in the cover, aren't yet converted and won't build. > Or what is the general consensus here? > > (And what do we do with TLS? It does have a ->sendpage() version, too ...) I know. There are three things left that I need to tackle, but I'd like to get opinions on some of the other bits and I might need some help with AF_TLS and AF_KCM. That said, should I just remove tls_sw_do_sendpage() since presumably the data is going to get copied(?) and encrypted and the source pages aren't going to be held onto? David
