On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 09:46:18AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:51:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thursday, April 23, 2015 02:03:08 PM Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > >> Most users of PM clocks do the exact same thing in runtime callbacks. > > >> Provide default callbacks and cleanup the existing users (keystone/davinci > > >> /omap1/sh) > > >> > > >> Rajendra Nayak (5): > > >> PM / clock_ops: Provide default runtime ops to users > > >> arm: keystone: remove boilerplate code and use USE_PM_CLK_RUNTIME_OPS > > >> arm: omap1: remove boilerplate code and use USE_PM_CLK_RUNTIME_OPS > > >> arm: davinci: remove boilerplate code and use USE_PM_CLK_RUNTIME_OPS > > >> drivers: sh: remove boilerplate code and use USE_PM_CLK_RUNTIME_OPS > > >> > > >> arch/arm/mach-davinci/pm_domain.c | 32 +------------------------- > > >> arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c | 33 +------------------------- > > >> arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c | 37 ++---------------------------- > > >> drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > >> drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c | 47 ++------------------------------------ > > >> include/linux/pm_clock.h | 10 ++++++++ > > >> 6 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-) > > > > > > It is not particularly clear to me who is supposed to apply this series, but > > > I can do that if people don't have problems with that. > > > > All later patches depend on the first patch. > > > > For shmobile, Simon has queued up changes for drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c, > > but I think they don't conflict with this series. > > Yes, that is the case. I have some patches (from Geert) queued up for v4.1. > I have confirmed that they do not conflict with the shmobile (last) patch > if this series. > > <details> > The patches are in the sh-drivers-for-v4.1 branch of my renesas tree; I > rebased them yesterday; they should hit next today if there is a next > today; I plan to send a pull request to Linus in the not to distant future; > and I envisage they should end up in v4.1-rc2 or rc3. The above mentioned changes were tagged as renesas-sh-drivers-for-v4.1 in my renesas tree; were merged into in Linus's tree yesterday; and should thus be included in v4.1-rc2. I do not have any other changes to drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c pending at this time. > </details> > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:34:33AM -0700, santosh shilimkar wrote: > > On 4/24/2015 7:41 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >On Thursday, April 23, 2015 02:03:08 PM Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > [snip] > > > >It is not particularly clear to me who is supposed to apply this series, but > > >I can do that if people don't have problems with that. > > > > > > > > I am fine by that given dependency with first patch. > > Another way is, you pick up the first patch and give us an > > immutable branch. > > > > Either way is fine by me. > > Likewise. > > Here is an ack for the shmobile (last) patch if you decide to take it > through your tree. > > Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
