On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 15:19 +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> +config CORESIGHT_QCOM_REPLICATOR
> + bool "Qualcomm CoreSight Replicator driver"
> + help
> + This enables support for CoreSight link and sink driver that are
> + responsible for transporting and collecting the trace data
> + respectively. Link and sinks are dynamically aggregated with a trace
> + entity at run time to form a complete trace path.
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_QCOM_REPLICATOR) += coresight-replicator-qcom.o
CORESIGHT_QCOM_REPLICATOR is a bool symbol. So
coresight-replicator-qcom.o will never be part of a module.
(If that's incorrect, you can stop reading here.)
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator-qcom.c
> +#include <linux/module.h>
Is this include needed?
> +static struct amba_driver replicator_driver = {
> + .drv = {
> + .name = "coresight-replicator-qcom",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
For built-in only code THIS_MODULE will be, basically, equivalent to
NULL (see include/linux/export.h). So I suppose this line can be
dropped.
> + .pm = &replicator_dev_pm_ops,
> + },
> + .probe = replicator_probe,
> + .remove = replicator_remove,
> + .id_table = replicator_ids,
> +};
> +
> +module_amba_driver(replicator_driver);
For built-in only code this is, assuming I grepped this correctly,
equivalent to calling
amba_driver_register(&replicator_driver);
from within a function marked with some sort of *initcall().
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm CoreSight Replicator driver");
For built-in only code these macros will be effectively preprocessed
away.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
