On 16/03/2023 07:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 14/03/2023 13:16, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On 14/03/2023 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Changes since v1 >>> ================ >>> 1. Rebase >>> 2. Make msm8994 fallback for several variants, not msm8953, because the latter >>> actually might take some clocks. >> >> Although the approach looks correct, I think that in some cases it tries >> to mark devices compatible judging from the current driver, not from the >> hardware itself. > > Which is what compatibility is about... > >> >> For the reference, on msm8994 the apcs is a clock controller for the l2 >> clocks (which we do not support yet). If I'm not mistaken, on msm8976 >> the apcs region contains a mux for the cluster1 clocks. On sdm630/660 >> the apcs region also seems to be involved in CPU clocks scaling. > > The question is this means they are incompatible? Since there are no more comments I assume they are actually compatible in the terms of SW interface. Best regards, Krzysztof
