Re: [PATCH 08/11] remoteproc: qcom: Add Hexagon based multipd rproc driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 11:52, Manikanta Mylavarapu
<quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/22/2023 3:51 PM, Robert Marko wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 11:19, Manikanta Mylavarapu
> > <quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/7/2023 9:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> Why exactly do you need a new driver for this instead of extending
> >>> existing PIL? I feel all this is growing because no one wants to touch
> >>> existing code and merge with it...
> >>
> >> Previously we raised patch to add secure-pil to existing rproc driver.
> >> Bjorn suggested to introduce a new secure-pil driver.
> >>
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/1611984013-10201-3-git-send-email-gokulsri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >>
> >>
> >> Also IPQ5018, IPQ9574 soc's follows multipd model. So we decided to
> >> have new driver which consists 'secure-pil + multi pd' in one
> >> place.
> >
> > Would it be possible to have IPQ8074 and IPQ6018 support in it as well?
> > Cause, those are supported by ath11k but remoteproc support is missing,
> > I have been upstreaming parts for IPQ8074 for years now and it is usable but
> > we are still missing remoteproc.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Robert
> > >>
> >> Thanks & Regards,
> >> Manikanta.
>
> Yes. It's possible. Currently we added support for IPQ5018, IPQ9574.
> In subsequent patches, we will add IPQ8074, IPQ6018 & IPQ5332 support
> as well.

Great, that is rather nice to hear.

Regards,
Robert
>
> Regards,
> Manikanta.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux