Re: [PATCH 08/11] remoteproc: qcom: Add Hexagon based multipd rproc driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 11:19, Manikanta Mylavarapu
<quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/7/2023 9:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Why exactly do you need a new driver for this instead of extending
> > existing PIL? I feel all this is growing because no one wants to touch
> > existing code and merge with it...
>
> Previously we raised patch to add secure-pil to existing rproc driver.
> Bjorn suggested to introduce a new secure-pil driver.
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/1611984013-10201-3-git-send-email-gokulsri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
>
> Also IPQ5018, IPQ9574 soc's follows multipd model. So we decided to
> have new driver which consists 'secure-pil + multi pd' in one
> place.

Would it be possible to have IPQ8074 and IPQ6018 support in it as well?
Cause, those are supported by ath11k but remoteproc support is missing,
I have been upstreaming parts for IPQ8074 for years now and it is usable but
we are still missing remoteproc.

Regards,
Robert

>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Manikanta.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux