This series tries to better sanitize what's actually allowed on which
SoC and lowers the minimum frequency domain count to 1, as that's what's
present on at least QCM2290.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Konrad Dybcio (8):
dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Allow just 1 frequency domain
dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Sanitize data per compatible
dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Add QCM2290
arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add SoC-specific compatible to cpufreq_hw
arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add SoC-specific compatible to cpufreq_hw
arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: Add SoC-specific compatible to cpufreq_hw
arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Add SoC-specific compatible to cpufreq_hw
arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add SoC-specific compatible to cpufreq_hw
.../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 2 +-
6 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 709c6adf19dc558e44ab5c01659b09a16a2d3c82
change-id: 20230308-topic-cpufreq_bindings-5f78e3af96b3
Best regards,
--
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
