On 3.03.2023 12:36, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 03/03/2023 11:35, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 03/03/2023 11:33, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3.03.2023 12:32, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>>> On 03/03/2023 02:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>> Currently, when sync_state calls set(n, n) all the paths for setting
>>>>> parameters on an icc node are called twice. Avoid that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 751f4d14cdb4 ("interconnect: icc-rpm: Set destination bandwidth as well as source bandwidth")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> RFC comes from the fact that I *believe* this should be correct, but I'm
>>>>> not entirely sure about it..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c | 2 +-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>>>>> index a6e0de03f46b..d35db1af9b08 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>>>>> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
>>>>> ret = __qcom_icc_set(src, src_qn, sum_bw);
>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>> - if (dst_qn) {
>>>>> + if (dst_qn && src_qn != dst_qn) {
>>>>> ret = __qcom_icc_set(dst, dst_qn, sum_bw);
>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible for src_qn == dst_qn ?
>>> As the commit message says, sync_state calls set(n, n) in
>>> drivers/interconnect/core.c : icc_sync_state(struct device *dev)
>>
>> So you've _seen_ that happen ?
>>
>
> Assuming you have, then why isn't the fix in sync_state i.e. that's an error for everybody right ?
I believe that there's simply no other way of updating every single node
on its own with the icc api, without taking any links into play. But I
see exynos and i.mx also effectively calling it twice on each node.
Konrad
