Re: [RFC PATCH] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpm: Don't call __qcom_icc_set twice on the same node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 3.03.2023 12:32, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 03/03/2023 02:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> Currently, when sync_state calls set(n, n) all the paths for setting
>> parameters on an icc node are called twice. Avoid that.
>>
>> Fixes: 751f4d14cdb4 ("interconnect: icc-rpm: Set destination bandwidth as well as source bandwidth")
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> RFC comes from the fact that I *believe* this should be correct, but I'm
>> not entirely sure about it..
>>
>>
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>> index a6e0de03f46b..d35db1af9b08 100644
>> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
>>       ret = __qcom_icc_set(src, src_qn, sum_bw);
>>       if (ret)
>>           return ret;
>> -    if (dst_qn) {
>> +    if (dst_qn && src_qn != dst_qn) {
>>           ret = __qcom_icc_set(dst, dst_qn, sum_bw);
>>           if (ret)
>>               return ret;
> 
> Is it possible for src_qn == dst_qn ?
As the commit message says, sync_state calls set(n, n) in
drivers/interconnect/core.c : icc_sync_state(struct device *dev)

Konrad
> 
> Iff you confirm that experimentally - add my
> 
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux