On 04/03, Andy Gross wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:43:50PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 04/02/15 12:25, Kumar Gala wrote: > > >> [1] http://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/arm-soc/kernel/v4.0-rc4-354-ga0690e6586df/ > > > I think we need to associated DT updates. > > > > > > > > > > What about this patch squashed on top? Just guessing but I suspect we > > don't care about cell-index if we're not doing the tcsr stuff. Also, I > > imagine we could get rid of cell-index entirely if we matched against > > the address of the gsbi instead. > > Except that the GSBI5 base address changes from chip to chip. > > Yep, for the cell-index removal part I was thinking we would make another table per SoC like we already have for the TCSR part. The table would map the physical address to the GSBI number. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
