On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:43:50PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/02/15 12:25, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Apr 2, 2015, at 3:37 AM, Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Andy, Kumar, > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Andy Gross (1): > >>> soc: qcom: gsbi: Add support for ADM CRCI muxing > >> this commit seems to break the boot on IFC6410, it was initially > >> reported on kernelci.org, see report and bootlog [1]. > >> > >> running git bisect led me to: > >> > >> e5fdad68d47ed344832b7ca4e18b2e9708d8141e is the first bad commit > >> commit e5fdad68d47ed344832b7ca4e18b2e9708d8141e > >> Author: Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Date: Mon Feb 9 16:01:06 2015 -0600 > >> > >> soc: qcom: gsbi: Add support for ADM CRCI muxing > >> > >> This patch adds automatic configuration for the ADM CRCI muxing required to > >> support DMA operations for GSBI clients. The GSBI mode and > >> instance determine > >> the correct TCSR ADM CRCI MUX value that must be programmed so that the DMA > >> works properly. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> > >> [1] http://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/arm-soc/kernel/v4.0-rc4-354-ga0690e6586df/ > > I think we need to associated DT updates. > > > > > > What about this patch squashed on top? Just guessing but I suspect we > don't care about cell-index if we're not doing the tcsr stuff. Also, I > imagine we could get rid of cell-index entirely if we matched against > the address of the gsbi instead. Except that the GSBI5 base address changes from chip to chip. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
