On 15.02.23 11:57, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:53 AM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten > Leemhuis) <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 11.02.23 15:27, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >>> On 10.02.23 11:07, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>>> On 2/10/23 10:22, Vikash Garodia wrote: >>>> >>>>>> So what should we do about this folks? Since not allowing the driver to probe on >>>>>> at least SC7180 is a quite serious regression, can we revert for now until a proper >>>>>> fix is figured out? >>>>> I am able to repro this issue on sc7180 and discussing with firmware team on the cause >>>>> of reset failure. The original patch was raised for fixing rare SMMU faults during warm >>>>> boot of video hardware. Hence looking to understand the regressing part before we >>>>> proceed to revert. >>>> Great, if you are working on a proper fix then that would be much better indeed. >>> Yeah, that's great, but OTOH: there is almost certainly just one week >>> before 6.2 will be released. Ideally this should be fixed by then. >>> Vikash, do you think that's in the cards? If not: why not revert this >>> now to make sure 6.2 works fine? >> Hmm, no reply. And we meanwhile have Wednesday and 6.2 is almost >> certainly going to be out on Sunday. And the problem was called "a quite >> serious regression" above. So why not quickly fix this with the revert, >> as proposed earlier? >> Vikash? Javier? > > I agree with you, that we should land this revert and then properly > fix the page fault issue in v6.3. > > But it's not my call, the v4l2/media folks have to decide that. In that case: Mauro, what's your opinion here? Thread starts here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230207102254.1446461-1-javierm@xxxxxxxxxx/ Regression report: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y9LSMap%2BjRxbtpC8@xxxxxxxxxx/ Ciao, Thorsten
