On 11.02.23 15:27, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 10.02.23 11:07, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> On 2/10/23 10:22, Vikash Garodia wrote: >> >>>> So what should we do about this folks? Since not allowing the driver to probe on >>>> at least SC7180 is a quite serious regression, can we revert for now until a proper >>>> fix is figured out? >>> >>> I am able to repro this issue on sc7180 and discussing with firmware team on the cause >>> of reset failure. The original patch was raised for fixing rare SMMU faults during warm >>> boot of video hardware. Hence looking to understand the regressing part before we >>> proceed to revert. >> >> Great, if you are working on a proper fix then that would be much better indeed. > > Yeah, that's great, but OTOH: there is almost certainly just one week > before 6.2 will be released. Ideally this should be fixed by then. > Vikash, do you think that's in the cards? If not: why not revert this > now to make sure 6.2 works fine? Hmm, no reply. And we meanwhile have Wednesday and 6.2 is almost certainly going to be out on Sunday. And the problem was called "a quite serious regression" above. So why not quickly fix this with the revert, as proposed earlier? Vikash? Javier? Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page. #regzbot ignore-activity
