On 2/7/23 01:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 02/02/2023 18:16, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
On 2/2/23 16:21, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 02/02/2023 15:04, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On 2/2/23 15:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 02/02/2023 14:50, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
On certain Snapdragon processors, the crypto engine clocks are
enabled by
default by security firmware.
Then probably we should not require them only on these variants.
I don't have the exact list of the affected SoCs, I believe Neil can
provide
such a list, if you find it crucial.
It's the case for SM8350, SM8450 & SM8550.
On SM8250 there is no QCE clocks also, so I'll add it to the list, and I
hope
that now the list is complete.
It could be that the relevant platforms are the ones with
'qcom,no-clock-support'
property of QCE in the downstream.
Then, sc7180, sc8180x, sdx55, sm6150, sm7150, sm8150 also have this
property in QCE device. And, I think, it should also be applicable to
sc7280 and sc8280xp.
So maybe do you have a better candidate among the SoCs for a QCE IP family
name than SM8150 based? Likely it could be the first released SoC among
mentioned above.
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
