Re: [PATCH v8 5/9] dt-bindings: qcom-qce: document clocks and clock-names as optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/2/23 16:21, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 02/02/2023 15:04, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,

On 2/2/23 15:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 02/02/2023 14:50, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>

On certain Snapdragon processors, the crypto engine clocks are enabled by
default by security firmware.

Then probably we should not require them only on these variants.

I don't have the exact list of the affected SoCs, I believe Neil can provide
such a list, if you find it crucial.

It's the case for SM8350, SM8450 & SM8550.


On SM8250 there is no QCE clocks also, so I'll add it to the list, and I hope
that now the list is complete.

It could be that the relevant platforms are the ones with 'qcom,no-clock-support'
property of QCE in the downstream.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux