Hi Steev,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:13 PM Steev Klimaszewski <steev@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >On 31/01/2023 05:38, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> .../qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts | 68 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
> >> index f936b020a71d..951438ac5946 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
> >> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ / {
> >> aliases {
> >> i2c4 = &i2c4;
> >> i2c21 = &i2c21;
> >> + serial0 = &uart17;
> >> + serial1 = &uart2;
> >> };
> >>
> >> wcd938x: audio-codec {
> >> @@ -712,6 +714,32 @@ &qup0 {
> >> status = "okay";
> >> };
> >>
> >> +&uart2 {
> >> + status = "okay";
> >> +
> >> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart2_state>;
> >> +
> >> + bluetooth {
> >> + compatible = "qcom,wcn6855-bt";
> >> +
> >> +/*
>
> > Why dead code should be in the kernel?
>
> As mentioned in the cover letter, this is a bit closer to an RFC than ready to
> go in, and I do apologize that it wasn't clear enough. I do not have access to
> the schematics, and based on my reading of the schema for bluetooth, these
> entries are supposed to be required, however, like the wcn6750, I have dummy
> data entered into the qca_soc_data_wcn6855 struct. I know that these should be
> there, I just do not have access to the correct information to put, if that
> makes sense?
Well you don't have the RFC set in the subject which is probably why
people are reviewing it like it is supposed to be merged, that said I
do wonder if there is to indicate these entries are to be considered
sort of experimental so we don't end up enabling it by default?
>
> <snip>
>
> >Does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run `make
> >dtbs_check` (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst
> >for instructions).
>
> Correct I had not, but I have now, and will make the corrections test and they
> will be included in v3.
>
> >Best regards,
> >Krzysztof
>
> I appreciate the guidance for what I was doing incorrectly.
>
> -- steev
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
