On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 01:49:12PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri 20 Mar 13:29 PDT 2015, Andy Gross wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 06:48:10PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > +Example:
> > > +
> > > + tcsr: syscon@1a400000 {
> >
> > typo here, syscon@fd484000. And this syscon is specifically for the tcsr mutex
> > reg area.
> >
>
> You're right, I didn't read the documentation good enough; let's name it
> tcsr-mutex and as this is not the main tcsr region we should fall back
> to just having syscon as compatible.
Agreed. A generic syscon will work until we need to support the other registers
in that block.
> But there's still a bunch of other registers in the tcsr-mutex range -
> that probably will be consumed by various drivers, so it still makes
> sense to have a syscon there.
Agreed.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
