On 01/02/2023 21:44, Marijn Suijten wrote: > As discussed in [1] it is more convenient to use a generic adc-chan node > name for ADC channels while storing a friendly - board-specific instead > of PMIC-specific - name in the label, if/when desired to overwrite the > channel description already contained (but previously unused) in the > driver [2]. > > Replace the .* name pattern with the adc-chan literal, but leave the > label property optional for bindings to choose to fall back a channel > label hardcoded in the driver [2] instead. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221106193018.270106-1-marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230116220909.196926-4-marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml | 16 +++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, Krzysztof
