Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: opp: opp-v2-kryo-cpu: enlarge opp-supported-hw maximum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 at 20:13, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 07:59:42PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 at 19:46, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Enlarge opp-supported-hw maximum value. In recent SoC we started
> > > matching more bit and we currently match mask of 112. The old maximum of
> > > 7 was good for old SoC that didn't had complex id, but now this is
> > > limiting and we need to enlarge it to support more variants.
> > >
> > > Document all the various mask that can be used and limit them to only
> > > reasonable values instead of using a generic maximum limit.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/opp/opp-v2-kryo-cpu.yaml         | 20 +++++++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-kryo-cpu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-kryo-cpu.yaml
> > > index b4947b326773..908cb0d7695a 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-kryo-cpu.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-kryo-cpu.yaml
> > > @@ -50,12 +50,28 @@ patternProperties:
> > >        opp-supported-hw:
> > >          description: |
> > >            A single 32 bit bitmap value, representing compatible HW.
> > > -          Bitmap:
> > > +          Bitmap for MSM8996 format:
> > >            0:  MSM8996, speedbin 0
> > >            1:  MSM8996, speedbin 1
> > >            2:  MSM8996, speedbin 2
> > >            3-31:  unused
> > > -        maximum: 0x7
> > > +
> > > +          Bitmap for MSM8996 later revision format:
> > > +          0:  MSM8996, speedbin 0
> > > +          1:  MSM8996, speedbin 1
> > > +          2:  MSM8996, speedbin 2
> > > +          3:  always set
> >
> > This is used for speedbin 3
> >
>
> Is it right that 4 bit speedbin is only introduced later? Cause looking
> at the current opp-supported-hw for MSM8996SG and MSM8996 originally
> (and based on what this Documentation say) there were only 3 bit and
> then they started using a 4th bit. Just asking if it's ok to keep the
> bitmap split or i should just merge it.

I don't think I got the question, please excuse me. Historically
msm8996.dtsi used 0xff as 'all possible platforms' value for the GPU
tables. Lately I fixed the CPU tables, added support for speed-bin 3.
However I left these 0xff in GPU opp table intact. I don't remember if
there was any reason behind that. Anyway this bit isn't always set, it
is set only for the entries which should be selected for MSM8996 speed
bin 3.

>
> > > +          4-31:  unused
> > > +
> > > +          Bitmap for MSM8996SG format (speedbin shifted of 4 left):
> > > +          0-3:  unused
> > > +          4:  MSM8996SG, speedbin 0
> > > +          5:  MSM8996SG, speedbin 1
> > > +          6:  MSM8996SG, speedbin 2
> > > +          7-31:  unused
> > > +        enum: [0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x4, 0x7,
> > > +               0x9, 0xd, 0xe, 0xf,
> > > +               0x10, 0x20, 0x30, 0x70]
> > >
> > >        clock-latency-ns: true
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.38.1
> > >
>
> --
>         Ansuel



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux