Hi Ivan,
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:06:10 +0200
"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Gilad,
>
> On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 15:54 -0700, Gilad Avidov wrote:
>
> >
> > +
> > +static u32 pmic_arb_fmt_cmd_v1(u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 bc)
> > +{
> > + return (opc << 27) | ((sid & 0xf) << 20) | (addr << 4) |
> > (bc & 0x7); +}
> > +
> > +static u32 pmic_arb_fmt_cmd_v2(u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 bc)
> > +{
> > + return (opc << 27) | ((addr & 0xff) << 4) | (bc & 0x7);
>
> This one is looking suspicious. Address could be only 8 bits? Slave
> ID is not used?
>
> Is this correct?
Yes it is correct.
On HW v2 we are writing the command directly to a channel which is
specific (already configured) to an SID and the upper 8 bits of the
address.
This is how we get the channel:
u32 offset = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(pmic_arb, sid, addr);
The lower 8 bits of the address is all that we need to have the
entire 20bits of SPMI addressing.
Thanks,
Gilad
>
> Ivan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
