On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 02:53:17PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 11:06 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > I'm sorry but I can't parse the above. What does "they could issue > > setup method" mean and why is it a problem? > Client drivers could execute spi_setup() in probe(), so we have > to ensure that CS GPIO's are available before this, no? I see. Yes, that's a concern. It should be in the changelog. > > > Requesting GPIO's in core framework is also not a easy > > > option because of arguments here[1]. > > We should really fix that though. > I think that pinctrl framework should automatically > request pins belonging to group when state is selected. That doesn't help users as not every GPIO is associated with a pin controller - they'd still have to handle the case where they had to do things themselves.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
