On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:28 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:23:35AM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > Hi, > > Don't reply off list unless there's a good reason... Sorry, it was not intentional. Wrong button. > > > > Any new GPIO users should really be using the gpiod API, however this is > > > duplicating core functionality so as Stephen says why are we doing this? > > > About the API usage, point taken. GPIO requesting part is more important > > in this case. pinctrl core did not request pins and wrong DT configuration > > could lead to surprises without any warnings or errors. > > That doesn't answer my concern at all. I am not sure that I am following you. I can not use spi_master::cs_gpios, which is populated by of_spi_register_master(), because spi_register_master() populate SPI devices and they could issue setup method. Requesting GPIO's in core framework is also not a easy option because of arguments here[1]. Probably I am still missing something. Regards, Ivan [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/24/75 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
