On Mar 5, 2015, at 7:59 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> The top level qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id are utilized by bootloaders >>>> on Qualcomm MSM platforms to determine which device tree should be >>>> utilized and passed to the kernel. >>>> >>>> Cc: <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Is this the special magic that allows qcom bootloaders to take a kernel >>> plus multiple DTBs and figure out which DTB to pass? >>> >>> Kevin >> >> yes > > That's a bummer. > > Luckily, the solution for upstream is still quite simple: Provide only > one devicetree, and it'll be used, right? We can provide only one, we still need the IDs in the DT. - k -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
