On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> The top level qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id are utilized by bootloaders >>> on Qualcomm MSM platforms to determine which device tree should be >>> utilized and passed to the kernel. >>> >>> Cc: <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Is this the special magic that allows qcom bootloaders to take a kernel >> plus multiple DTBs and figure out which DTB to pass? >> >> Kevin > > yes That's a bummer. Luckily, the solution for upstream is still quite simple: Provide only one devicetree, and it'll be used, right? -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html