Re: [PATCH v5 09/20] thermal/drivers/tsens: Support using nvmem cells for calibration data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 at 13:47, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 29.12.2022 12:42, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 at 12:47, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 29.12.2022 04:00, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> Add a unified function using nvmem cells for parsing the calibration
> >>> data rather than parsing the calibration blob manually.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c | 15 ++++++
> >>>  drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c   | 11 ++++-
> >>>  drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c      | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h      |  5 ++
> >>>  4 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c
> >>> index 579028ea48f4..6c9e491f9559 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c
> >>> @@ -229,6 +229,11 @@ static int calibrate_8916(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> >>>       u32 p1[5], p2[5];
> >>>       int mode = 0;
> >>>       u32 *qfprom_cdata, *qfprom_csel;
> >>> +     int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +     ret = tsens_calibrate_nvmem(priv, 3);
> >>> +     if (!ret)
> >>> +             return 0;
> >>>
> >>>       qfprom_cdata = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib");
> >>>       if (IS_ERR(qfprom_cdata))
> >>> @@ -286,6 +291,11 @@ static int calibrate_8939(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> >>>       int mode = 0;
> >>>       u32 *qfprom_cdata;
> >>>       u32 cdata[4];
> >>> +     int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +     ret = tsens_calibrate_common(priv);
> >>> +     if (!ret)
> >>> +             return 0;
> >>>
> >>>       qfprom_cdata = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib");
> >>>       if (IS_ERR(qfprom_cdata))
> >>> @@ -486,6 +496,11 @@ static int calibrate_9607(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> >>>       u32 p1[5], p2[5];
> >>>       int mode = 0;
> >>>       u32 *qfprom_cdata;
> >>> +     int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +     ret = tsens_calibrate_common(priv);
> >>> +     if (!ret)
> >>> +             return 0;
> >>>
> >>>       qfprom_cdata = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib");
> >>>       if (IS_ERR(qfprom_cdata))
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c
> >>> index 83c2853546d0..5bba75a845c5 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c
> >>> @@ -143,7 +143,11 @@ static int calibrate_v1(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> >>>       u32 p1[10], p2[10];
> >>>       u32 mode = 0, lsb = 0, msb = 0;
> >>>       u32 *qfprom_cdata;
> >>> -     int i;
> >>> +     int i, ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +     ret = tsens_calibrate_common(priv);
> >>> +     if (!ret)
> >>> +             return 0;
> >>>
> >>>       qfprom_cdata = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib");
> >>>       if (IS_ERR(qfprom_cdata))
> >>> @@ -209,6 +213,11 @@ static int calibrate_8976(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> >>>       u32 p1[11], p2[11];
> >>>       int mode = 0, tmp = 0;
> >>>       u32 *qfprom_cdata;
> >>> +     int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +     ret = tsens_calibrate_common(priv);
> >>> +     if (!ret)
> >>> +             return 0;
> >>>
> >>>       qfprom_cdata = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib");
> >>>       if (IS_ERR(qfprom_cdata))
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> >>> index b191e19df93d..ce568a68de4a 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> >>> @@ -70,6 +70,82 @@ char *qfprom_read(struct device *dev, const char *cname)
> >>>       return ret;
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>> +int tsens_calibrate_nvmem(struct tsens_priv *priv, int shift)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     u32 mode;
> >>> +     u32 base1, base2;
> >>> +     u32 p1[MAX_SENSORS], p2[MAX_SENSORS];
> >>> +     char name[] = "sXX_pY"; /* s10_p1 */
> >>> +     int i, ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +     if (priv->num_sensors > MAX_SENSORS)
> >>> +             return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> +     ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(priv->dev, "mode", &mode);
> >>> +     if (ret == -ENOENT)
> >>> +             dev_warn(priv->dev, "Please migrate to separate nvmem cells for calibration data\n");
> >>> +     if (ret < 0)
> >>> +             return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +     dev_dbg(priv->dev, "calibration mode is %d\n", mode);
> >>> +
> >>> +     ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(priv->dev, "base1", &base1);
> >>> +     if (ret < 0)
> >>> +             return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +     ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(priv->dev, "base2", &base2);
> >>> +     if (ret < 0)
> >>> +             return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +     for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) {
> >>> +             ret = snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "s%d_p1", priv->sensor[i].hw_id);
> >> I think you forgot to update the underscore to a hyphen here
> >> (unless the nvmem api does some magic internally).
> >
> > No. Please see the nvmem-cell-names property of the tsens nodes. It
> > uses underscores. Then OF code translates this sX_pY string into an
> > index in the nvmem-cells array or phandles. The sX-pY@ZZ node name is
> > not used during lookups at all.
> Right, I overlooked that!
>
> >
> >>
> >> Konrad
> >>> +             if (ret < 0)
> >>> +                     return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +             ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(priv->dev, name, &p1[i]);
> >>> +             if (ret)
> >>> +                     return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +             ret = snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "s%d_p2", priv->sensor[i].hw_id);
> >>> +             if (ret < 0)
> >>> +                     return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +             ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(priv->dev, name, &p2[i]);
> >>> +             if (ret)
> >>> +                     return ret;
> >>> +     }
> >>> +
> >>> +     switch (mode) {
> >>> +     case ONE_PT_CALIB:
> >>> +             for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++)
> >>> +                     p1[i] = p1[i] + (base1 << shift);
> >>> +             break;
> >>> +     case TWO_PT_CALIB:
> >>> +             for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++)
> >>> +                     p2[i] = (p2[i] + base2) << shift;
> >>> +             fallthrough;
> >>> +     case ONE_PT_CALIB2:
> >>> +             for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++)
> >>> +                     p1[i] = (p1[i] + base1) << shift;
> >>> +             break;
> >>> +     default:
> >>> +             dev_dbg(priv->dev, "calibrationless mode\n");
> This could be a dev_warn, as we usually don't expect it to happen.

I'm not so sure here. Current code handles this case without any
warnings, as one of the expected cases So, I don't think the rework
should start emitting warnings.

> Other than that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Konrad
> >>> +             for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) {
> >>> +                     p1[i] = 500;
> >>> +                     p2[i] = 780;
> >>> +             }
> >>> +     }
> >>> +
> >>> +     compute_intercept_slope(priv, p1, p2, mode);
> >>> +
> >>> +     return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +int tsens_calibrate_common(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     return tsens_calibrate_nvmem(priv, 2);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>>  /*
> >>>   * Use this function on devices where slope and offset calculations
> >>>   * depend on calibration data read from qfprom. On others the slope
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> >>> index 7dd5fc246894..645ae02438fa 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> >>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> >>>  #ifndef __QCOM_TSENS_H__
> >>>  #define __QCOM_TSENS_H__
> >>>
> >>> +#define NO_PT_CALIB          0x0
> >>>  #define ONE_PT_CALIB         0x1
> >>>  #define ONE_PT_CALIB2                0x2
> >>>  #define TWO_PT_CALIB         0x3
> >>> @@ -17,6 +18,8 @@
> >>>  #define THRESHOLD_MAX_ADC_CODE       0x3ff
> >>>  #define THRESHOLD_MIN_ADC_CODE       0x0
> >>>
> >>> +#define MAX_SENSORS 16
> >>> +
> >>>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >>>  #include <linux/thermal.h>
> >>>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >>> @@ -582,6 +585,8 @@ struct tsens_priv {
> >>>  };
> >>>
> >>>  char *qfprom_read(struct device *dev, const char *cname);
> >>> +int tsens_calibrate_nvmem(struct tsens_priv *priv, int shift);
> >>> +int tsens_calibrate_common(struct tsens_priv *priv);
> >>>  void compute_intercept_slope(struct tsens_priv *priv, u32 *pt1, u32 *pt2, u32 mode);
> >>>  int init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv);
> >>>  int get_temp_tsens_valid(const struct tsens_sensor *s, int *temp);
> >
> >
> >



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux