On 22/12/2022 11:10, Marijn Suijten wrote: > On 2022-12-22 10:29:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 22/12/2022 09:23, Marijn Suijten wrote: >>> On 2022-12-20 10:52:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 19/12/2022 20:28, Marijn Suijten wrote: >>>>> On 2022-12-19 10:09:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>> On 19/12/2022 10:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>>> On 16/12/2022 22:58, Marijn Suijten wrote: >>>>>>>> From: Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Document smmu-500 compatibility with the SM6125 SoC. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> Wait, not entirely... no constraints for clocks and regs? >>>>> >>>>> Quite odd that there is no warning for my DT patch as it clearly >>>>> requires at least one clock... >>> >>> Again, any idea why there's no warning for this DT mismatching minItems: >>> 1 for clocks, clock-names and power-domains? >> >> I don't know what do you have in DT and what is mismatched. Why there >> should be a warning? > > There is: > > clock-names: > minItems: 1 > maxItems: 7 > > clocks: > minItems: 1 > maxItems: 7 > > But I did not provide _any_ (see patch 2 of this series). Shouldn't > that trigger a warning? No. Are these required properties? Best regards, Krzysztof
