On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 03:11:36PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/12/2022 14:50, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > > >>> Also, the id table is > >>> an overkill since there is only one driver that is making use of it. And > >>> moreover, there is no definite ID to use. > >> > >> Every driver with a single device support has usually ID table and it's > >> not a problem... > >> > > > > Are you referring to OF/ACPI ID table? Or something else? > > No, I refer to the driver ID table (I2C, platform whatever the driver is). > Yeah, that's what I wanted to avoid here. The ID table makes sense if you have a bus like I2C or a separate subsystem but here LLCC is an individual driver. So creating a separate ID table is an overkill IMO. Thanks, Mani > Best regards, > Krzysztof > -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
