Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 15.12.2022 17:56, Lux Aliaga wrote:
> On 15/12/2022 13:18, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
>> On 15.12.2022 17:12, Lux Aliaga wrote:
>>> Adds a UFS host controller node and its corresponding PHY to
>>> the sm6125 platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <they@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>>> index 7e25a4f85594..6d4534c7a2fe 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>>> @@ -508,6 +508,72 @@ sdhc_2: mmc@4784000 {
>>>               status = "disabled";
>>>           };
>>>   +        ufs_mem_hc: ufs@4804000 {
>>> +            compatible = "qcom,sm6125-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>>> +            reg = <0x04804000 0x3000>, <0x04810000 0x8000>;
>>> +            reg-names = "std", "ice";
>>> +            interrupts = <GIC_SPI 356 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> +            phys = <&ufs_mem_phy_lanes>;
>>> +            phy-names = "ufsphy";
>>> +            lanes-per-direction = <1>;
>>> +            #reset-cells = <1>;
>>> +            resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
>>> +            reset-names = "rst";
>>> +
>>> +            clock-names = "core_clk",
>>> +                "bus_aggr_clk",
>>> +                "iface_clk",
>>> +                "core_clk_unipro",
>>> +                "ref_clk",
>>> +                "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
>>> +                "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
>>> +                "ice_core_clk";
>>> +            clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
>>> +                <&gcc GCC_SYS_NOC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
>>> +                <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
>>> +                <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
>>> +                <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
>>> +                <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
>>> +                <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
>>> +                <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
>>> +            freq-table-hz = <50000000 240000000>,
>>> +                <0 0>,
>>> +                <0 0>,
>>> +                <37500000 150000000>,
>>> +                <0 0>,
>>> +                <0 0>,
>>> +                <0 0>,
>>> +                <75000000 300000000>;
>> The indentation is wrong. Make sure your tab size is set to 8
>> and all the <> entries align with the first one.
> Should I do this with clocks and clock-names too?
Yes, every "vertical list" (for a lack of a better name)
should be aligned. Add as many tabs as you can and fill
the rest with spaces.

Konrad
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux