Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes

[Lux Aliaga <they@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 15/12/2022 13:18, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

> On 15.12.2022 17:12, Lux Aliaga wrote:
> > Adds a UFS host controller node and its corresponding PHY to
> > the sm6125 platform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <they@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
> > index 7e25a4f85594..6d4534c7a2fe 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
> > @@ -508,6 +508,72 @@ sdhc_2: mmc@4784000 {
> >   			status = "disabled";
> >   		};
> >   
> > +		ufs_mem_hc: ufs@4804000 {
> > +			compatible = "qcom,sm6125-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> > +			reg = <0x04804000 0x3000>, <0x04810000 0x8000>;
> > +			reg-names = "std", "ice";
> > +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 356 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy_lanes>;
> > +			phy-names = "ufsphy";
> > +			lanes-per-direction = <1>;
> > +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> > +			resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
> > +			reset-names = "rst";
> > +
> > +			clock-names = "core_clk",
> > +				"bus_aggr_clk",
> > +				"iface_clk",
> > +				"core_clk_unipro",
> > +				"ref_clk",
> > +				"tx_lane0_sync_clk",
> > +				"rx_lane0_sync_clk",
> > +				"ice_core_clk";
> > +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> > +				<&gcc GCC_SYS_NOC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> > +				<&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
> > +				<&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
> > +				<&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
> > +				<&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> > +				<&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> > +				<&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
> > +			freq-table-hz = <50000000 240000000>,
> > +				<0 0>,
> > +				<0 0>,
> > +				<37500000 150000000>,
> > +				<0 0>,
> > +				<0 0>,
> > +				<0 0>,
> > +				<75000000 300000000>;
> The indentation is wrong. Make sure your tab size is set to 8
> and all the <> entries align with the first one.
Should I do this with clocks and clock-names too?

--
Lux Aliaga
https://nixgoat.me/