On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 01:23:11PM -0500, Brian Masney wrote:
> According to the downstream 5.4 kernel sources for the sa8540p,
> i2c@894000 is labeled i2c bus 21, not 5. The interrupts and clocks
> also match. Let's go ahead and correct the name that's used in the
> three files where this is listed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 152d1faf1e2f3 ("arm64: dts: qcom: add SC8280XP platform")
> Fixes: ccd3517faf183 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add reference device")
> Fixes: 32c231385ed43 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: add Lenovo Thinkpad X13s devicetree")
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> index 109c9d2b684d..875cc91324ce 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> @@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ qup2_uart17: serial@884000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> - qup2_i2c5: i2c@894000 {
> + qup2_i2c21: i2c@894000 {
Note that the node is labelled qup2_i2c5 and not qup_i2c5.
That is, the QUP nodes are labelled using two indices, and specifically
qup2_i2c5
would be another name for
qup_i2c21
if we'd been using such a flat naming scheme (there are 8 engines per
QUP).
So there's nothing wrong with how these nodes are currently named, but
mixing the two scheme as you are suggesting would not be correct.
Johan
