Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] remoteproc: core: do pm relax when in RPROC_OFFLINE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/3/2022 2:09 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 05:45:31PM +0800, Maria Yu wrote:
RPROC_OFFLINE state indicate there is no recovery process
is in progress and no chance to do the pm_relax.
Because when recovering from crash, rproc->lock is held and
state is RPROC_CRASHED -> RPROC_OFFLINE -> RPROC_RUNNING,
and then unlock rproc->lock.
When the state is in RPROC_OFFLINE it means separate request
of rproc_stop was done and no need to hold the wakeup source
in crash handler to recover any more.


It's not obvious to me that you're trying to say here is "make sure that
pm_relax() happens even when the remoteproc is stopped before the crash
handler work is scheduled".

Will be addressed in new patchset. Thx.
Signed-off-by: Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 8 +++++++-
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 8768cb64f560..c2d0af048c69 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1862,11 +1862,16 @@ static void rproc_crash_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_lock(&rproc->lock); - if (rproc->state == RPROC_CRASHED || rproc->state == RPROC_OFFLINE) {
+	if (rproc->state == RPROC_CRASHED) {
  		/* handle only the first crash detected */
  		mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
  		return;
  	}
+	if (rproc->state == RPROC_OFFLINE) {
+		/* no need to recover if remote processor is offline */

I don't think it's correct to say "no need", I think if the user stopped
the remoteproc before the recovery was scheduled recovery would undo
that stop...

So perhaps something like:

"Don't recover if the remote processor was stopped"

Will be addressed in new patchset. Thx.
Regards,
Bjorn

+		mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
+		goto out;
+	}
rproc->state = RPROC_CRASHED;
  	dev_err(dev, "handling crash #%u in %s\n", ++rproc->crash_cnt,
@@ -1877,6 +1882,7 @@ static void rproc_crash_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
  	if (!rproc->recovery_disabled)
  		rproc_trigger_recovery(rproc);
+out:
  	pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
  }
--
2.17.1



--
Thx and BRs,
Aiqun(Maria) Yu



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux