[PATCH v5 1/2] remoteproc: core: do pm relax when in RPROC_OFFLINE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



RPROC_OFFLINE state indicate there is no recovery process
is in progress and no chance to do the pm_relax.
Because when recovering from crash, rproc->lock is held and
state is RPROC_CRASHED -> RPROC_OFFLINE -> RPROC_RUNNING,
and then unlock rproc->lock.
When the state is in RPROC_OFFLINE it means separate request
of rproc_stop was done and no need to hold the wakeup source
in crash handler to recover any more.

Signed-off-by: Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 8768cb64f560..c2d0af048c69 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1862,11 +1862,16 @@ static void rproc_crash_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
 
-	if (rproc->state == RPROC_CRASHED || rproc->state == RPROC_OFFLINE) {
+	if (rproc->state == RPROC_CRASHED) {
 		/* handle only the first crash detected */
 		mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
 		return;
 	}
+	if (rproc->state == RPROC_OFFLINE) {
+		/* no need to recover if remote processor is offline */
+		mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	rproc->state = RPROC_CRASHED;
 	dev_err(dev, "handling crash #%u in %s\n", ++rproc->crash_cnt,
@@ -1877,6 +1882,7 @@ static void rproc_crash_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	if (!rproc->recovery_disabled)
 		rproc_trigger_recovery(rproc);
 
+out:
 	pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux